说起contengProvider这个组件平时开发用的不多，但其却是多进程的一大利器，binder规定传递的数据大多在1m以内，然而contengProvider在访问通讯录的数据很大，那它内部是如何工作的呢？
首先看下其查询的方法
ContentResolver cr = getContentResolver();
Cursor cursor = cr.query(uri, null, null, null, null);
表明了向第三方的app进行查询的操作，先透露以下，getContentResolver()获得是ContentResolver的proxy对象
那究竟是如何获得的呢？
class ContextImpl extends Context {
public ContentResolver getContentResolver() {
return mContentResolver;
}
private ContextImpl(...) {
...
mContentResolver = new ApplicationContentResolver(this, mainThread, user);
}
}
可以看到调用的是ContentResolver方法的query操作
public final @Nullable Cursor query(final @RequiresPermission.Read @NonNull Uri uri,
@Nullable String[] projection, @Nullable Bundle queryArgs,
@Nullable CancellationSignal cancellationSignal) {
Preconditions.checkNotNull(uri, "uri");
IContentProvider unstableProvider = acquireUnstableProvider(uri);
if (unstableProvider == null) {
return null;
}
IContentProvider stableProvider = null;
Cursor qCursor = null;
try {
long startTime = SystemClock.uptimeMillis();
ICancellationSignal remoteCancellationSignal = null;
...
}
这里重点看acquireUnstableProvider获得的这个IContentProvider对象
方法的调用在ApplicationContentResolver的acquireProvider方法
@Override
protected IContentProvider acquireProvider(Context context, String auth) {
return mMainThread.acquireProvider(context,
ContentProvider.getAuthorityWithoutUserId(auth),
resolveUserIdFromAuthority(auth), true);
}
也就是activiththread的acquireProvider方法，也就是核心方法
public final IContentProvider acquireProvider(
Context c, String auth, int userId, boolean stable) {
final IContentProvider provider = acquireExistingProvider(c, auth, userId, stable);
if (provider != null) {
return provider;
}
// There is a possible race here. Another thread may try to acquire
// the same provider at the same time. When this happens, we want to ensure
// that the first one wins.
// Note that we cannot hold the lock while acquiring and installing the
// provider since it might take a long time to run and it could also potentially
// be re-entrant in the case where the provider is in the same process.
ContentProviderHolder holder = null;
try {
holder = ActivityManager.getService().getContentProvider(
getApplicationThread(), auth, userId, stable);
} catch (RemoteException ex) {
throw ex.rethrowFromSystemServer();
}
if (holder == null) {
Slog.e(TAG, "Failed to find provider info for " + auth);
return null;
}
// Install provider will increment the reference count for us, and break
// any ties in the race.
holder = installProvider(c, holder, holder.info,
true /*noisy*/, holder.noReleaseNeeded, stable);
return holder.provider;
}
这里先从acquireExistingProvider方法里取IContentProvider，这方法也就是从mProviderMap中取缓存对象，取不到的话就调用ams的
getContentProvider方法，然后在拿到的holder不为null的情况下
调用installProvider方法。先跳过ams的方法，看下installProvider的方法
private ContentProviderHolder installProvider(Context context,
ContentProviderHolder holder, ProviderInfo info,
boolean noisy, boolean noReleaseNeeded, boolean stable) {
...
ContentProviderHolder retHolder;
synchronized (mProviderMap) {
if (DEBUG_PROVIDER) Slog.v(TAG, "Checking to add " + provider
+ " / " + info.name);
IBinder jBinder = provider.asBinder();
if (localProvider != null) {
ComponentName cname = new ComponentName(info.packageName, info.name);
ProviderClientRecord pr = mLocalProvidersByName.get(cname);
if (pr != null) {
if (DEBUG_PROVIDER) {
Slog.v(TAG, "installProvider: lost the race, "
+ "using existing local provider");
}
provider = pr.mProvider;
} else {
holder = new ContentProviderHolder(info);
holder.provider = provider;
holder.noReleaseNeeded = true;
pr = installProviderAuthoritiesLocked(provider, localProvider, holder);
mLocalProviders.put(jBinder, pr);
mLocalProvidersByName.put(cname, pr);
}
retHolder = pr.mHolder;
} else {
ProviderRefCount prc = mProviderRefCountMap.get(jBinder);
if (prc != null) {
if (DEBUG_PROVIDER) {
Slog.v(TAG, "installProvider: lost the race, updating ref count");
}
// We need to transfer our new reference to the existing
// ref count, releasing the old one... but only if
// release is needed (that is, it is not running in the
// system process).
if (!noReleaseNeeded) {
incProviderRefLocked(prc, stable);
try {
ActivityManager.getService().removeContentProvider(
holder.connection, stable);
} catch (RemoteException e) {
//do nothing content provider object is dead any way
}
}
} else {
ProviderClientRecord client = installProviderAuthoritiesLocked(
provider, localProvider, holder);
if (noReleaseNeeded) {
prc = new ProviderRefCount(holder, client, 1000, 1000);
} else {
prc = stable
? new ProviderRefCount(holder, client, 1, 0)
: new ProviderRefCount(holder, client, 0, 1);
}
mProviderRefCountMap.put(jBinder, prc);
}
retHolder = prc.holder;
}
}
return retHolder;
}
这里主要是对ProviderClientRecord对象一些赋值的操作，无论localProvider是否为空都会执行installProviderAuthoritiesLocked这个方法
private ProviderClientRecord installProviderAuthoritiesLocked(IContentProvider provider,
ContentProvider localProvider, ContentProviderHolder holder) {
final String auths[] = holder.info.authority.split(";");
final int userId = UserHandle.getUserId(holder.info.applicationInfo.uid);
if (provider != null) {
// If this provider is hosted by the core OS and cannot be upgraded,
// then I guess we're okay doing blocking calls to it.
for (String auth : auths) {
switch (auth) {
case ContactsContract.AUTHORITY:
case CallLog.AUTHORITY:
case CallLog.SHADOW_AUTHORITY:
case BlockedNumberContract.AUTHORITY:
case CalendarContract.AUTHORITY:
case Downloads.Impl.AUTHORITY:
case "telephony":
Binder.allowBlocking(provider.asBinder());
}
}
}
final ProviderClientRecord pcr = new ProviderClientRecord(
auths, provider, localProvider, holder);
for (String auth : auths) {
final ProviderKey key = new ProviderKey(auth, userId);
final ProviderClientRecord existing = mProviderMap.get(key);
if (existing != null) {
Slog.w(TAG, "Content provider " + pcr.mHolder.info.name
+ " already published as " + auth);
} else {
mProviderMap.put(key, pcr);
}
}
return pcr;
}
也就是把key和value放到mProviderMap中，由此判断出来此方法是做一些缓存工作和赋值操作的，让以后的调用不要走ams的流程。
ams获取的流程
holder = ActivityManager.getService().getContentProvider(
getApplicationThread(), auth, userId, stable);
这里ams的主要功能如下
private final ContentProviderHolder getContentProviderImpl(IApplicationThread caller, String name, IBinder token, boolean stable, int userId) {
ContentProviderRecord cpr;
ContentProviderConnection conn = null;
ProviderInfo cpi = null;
synchronized(this) {
//获取调用者的进程记录ProcessRecord；
ProcessRecord r = getRecordForAppLocked(caller);
cpr = mProviderMap.getProviderByName(name, userId);
...
boolean providerRunning = cpr != null;
if (proc != null && proc.thread != null && !proc.killed) {
if (DEBUG_PROVIDER) Slog.d(TAG_PROVIDER,
"Installing in existing process " + proc);
if (!proc.pubProviders.containsKey(cpi.name)) {
checkTime(startTime, "getContentProviderImpl: scheduling install");
proc.pubProviders.put(cpi.name, cpr);
try {
proc.thread.scheduleInstallProvider(cpi);
} catch (RemoteException e) {
}
}
} else {
checkTime(startTime, "getContentProviderImpl: before start process");
proc = startProcessLocked(cpi.processName,
cpr.appInfo, false, 0, "content provider",
new ComponentName(cpi.applicationInfo.packageName,
cpi.name), false, false, false);
checkTime(startTime, "getContentProviderImpl: after start process");
if (proc == null) {
Slog.w(TAG, "Unable to launch app "
+ cpi.applicationInfo.packageName + "/"
+ cpi.applicationInfo.uid + " for provider "
+ name + ": process is bad");
return null;
}
}
}
//等待provider发布完成
synchronized (cpr) {
while (cpr.provider == null) {
cpr.wait();
}
}
return cpr != null ? cpr.newHolder(conn) : null;
}
从ams中查询cpr也就是ContentProvider端的进程是否存在
如果进程存在就调用activitythread的scheduleInstallProvider方法
如果进程不存在就调用startProcessLocked开启进程
下面是一个ams挂起的过程
先讨论进程存在的时候：
在activitythread中
@Override
public void scheduleInstallProvider(ProviderInfo provider) {
sendMessage(H.INSTALL_PROVIDER, provider);
}
会发一个消息
public void handleInstallProvider(ProviderInfo info) {
final StrictMode.ThreadPolicy oldPolicy = StrictMode.allowThreadDiskWrites();
try {
installContentProviders(mInitialApplication, Lists.newArrayList(info));
} finally {
StrictMode.setThreadPolicy(oldPolicy);
}
}
调用其installContentProviders方法
private void installContentProviders(
Context context, List<ProviderInfo> providers) {
final ArrayList<ContentProviderHolder> results = new ArrayList<>();
for (ProviderInfo cpi : providers) {
if (DEBUG_PROVIDER) {
StringBuilder buf = new StringBuilder(128);
buf.append("Pub ");
buf.append(cpi.authority);
buf.append(": ");
buf.append(cpi.name);
Log.i(TAG, buf.toString());
}
ContentProviderHolder cph = installProvider(context, null, cpi,
false /*noisy*/, true /*noReleaseNeeded*/, true /*stable*/);
if (cph != null) {
cph.noReleaseNeeded = true;
results.add(cph);
}
}
try {
ActivityManager.getService().publishContentProviders(
getApplicationThread(), results);
} catch (RemoteException ex) {
throw ex.rethrowFromSystemServer();
}
}
这里来接收，会调用installContentProviders还是调用installProvider方法，从上面我们知道当ContentProviderHolder不为null的时候调用添加缓存的，那为null时候的调用呢？
private ContentProviderHolder installProvider(Context context,
ContentProviderHolder holder, ProviderInfo info,
boolean noisy, boolean noReleaseNeeded, boolean stable) {
ContentProvider localProvider = null;
IContentProvider provider;
if (holder == null || holder.provider == null) {
if (DEBUG_PROVIDER || noisy) {
Slog.d(TAG, "Loading provider " + info.authority + ": "
+ info.name);
}
Context c = null;
ApplicationInfo ai = info.applicationInfo;
if (context.getPackageName().equals(ai.packageName)) {
c = context;
} else if (mInitialApplication != null &&
mInitialApplication.getPackageName().equals(ai.packageName)) {
c = mInitialApplication;
} else {
try {
c = context.createPackageContext(ai.packageName,
Context.CONTEXT_INCLUDE_CODE);
} catch (PackageManager.NameNotFoundException e) {
// Ignore
}
}
if (c == null) {
Slog.w(TAG, "Unable to get context for package " +
ai.packageName +
" while loading content provider " +
info.name);
return null;
}
if (info.splitName != null) {
try {
c = c.createContextForSplit(info.splitName);
} catch (NameNotFoundException e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
}
try {
final java.lang.ClassLoader cl = c.getClassLoader();
localProvider = (ContentProvider)cl.
loadClass(info.name).newInstance();
provider = localProvider.getIContentProvider();
if (provider == null) {
Slog.e(TAG, "Failed to instantiate class " +
info.name + " from sourceDir " +
info.applicationInfo.sourceDir);
return null;
}
if (DEBUG_PROVIDER) Slog.v(
TAG, "Instantiating local provider " + info.name);
// XXX Need to create the correct context for this provider.
localProvider.attachInfo(c, info);
} catch (java.lang.Exception e) {
if (!mInstrumentation.onException(null, e)) {
throw new RuntimeException(
"Unable to get provider " + info.name
+ ": " + e.toString(), e);
}
return null;
}
} else {
provider = holder.provider;
if (DEBUG_PROVIDER) Slog.v(TAG, "Installing external provider " + info.authority + ": "
+ info.name);
}
....
}
可以看到是通过反射创建出ContentProvider对象然后调用其attachInfo方法的
在创建完之后又调用ams的publishContentProviders方法目的就是让ams notify刚刚挂起的进程
public final void publishContentProviders(IApplicationThread caller, List<ContentProviderHolder> providers) {
if (providers == null) {
return;
}
synchronized (this) {
final ProcessRecord r = getRecordForAppLocked(caller);
if (r == null) {
throw new SecurityException(...);
}
final long origId = Binder.clearCallingIdentity();
final int N = providers.size();
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
ContentProviderHolder src = providers.get(i);
if (src == null || src.info == null || src.provider == null) {
continue;
}
ContentProviderRecord dst = r.pubProviders.get(src.info.name);
if (dst != null) {
ComponentName comp = new ComponentName(dst.info.packageName, dst.info.name);
mProviderMap.putProviderByClass(comp, dst);
String names[] = dst.info.authority.split(";");
for (int j = 0; j < names.length; j++) {
mProviderMap.putProviderByName(names[j], dst);
}
int launchingCount = mLaunchingProviders.size();
int j;
boolean wasInLaunchingProviders = false;
for (j = 0; j < launchingCount; j++) {
if (mLaunchingProviders.get(j) == dst){
mLaunchingProviders.remove(j);
wasInLaunchingProviders = true;
j--;
launchingCount--;
}
}
if (wasInLaunchingProviders) {
mHandler.removeMessages(CONTENT_PROVIDER_PUBLISH_TIMEOUT_MSG, r);
}
synchronized (dst) {
dst.provider = src.provider;
dst.proc = r
dst.notifyAll();
}
updateOomAdjLocked(r);
}
}
Binder.restoreCallingIdentity(origId);
} }
当有进程没有ContentProvider分析完了，再来看下没有进程的情况
在启动进程时会ams会调用attachApplication方法
@Override
public final void attachApplication(IApplicationThread thread) {
synchronized (this) {
int callingPid = Binder.getCallingPid();
final long origId = Binder.clearCallingIdentity();
attachApplicationLocked(thread, callingPid);
Binder.restoreCallingIdentity(origId);
}
}
这里有个attachApplicationLocked方法里面会调用generateApplicationProvidersLocked方法也就是ams缓存ContentProviderRecord的逻辑
private final List<ProviderInfo> generateApplicationProvidersLocked(ProcessRecord app) {
List<ProviderInfo> providers = null;
try {
providers = AppGlobals.getPackageManager()
.queryContentProviders(app.processName, app.uid,
STOCK_PM_FLAGS | PackageManager.GET_URI_PERMISSION_PATTERNS
| MATCH_DEBUG_TRIAGED_MISSING, /*metadastaKey=*/ null)
.getList();
} catch (RemoteException ex) {
}
if (DEBUG_MU) Slog.v(TAG_MU,
"generateApplicationProvidersLocked, app.info.uid = " + app.uid);
int userId = app.userId;
if (providers != null) {
int N = providers.size();
app.pubProviders.ensureCapacity(N + app.pubProviders.size());
for (int i=0; i<N; i++) {
// TODO: keep logic in sync with installEncryptionUnawareProviders
ProviderInfo cpi =
(ProviderInfo)providers.get(i);
boolean singleton = isSingleton(cpi.processName, cpi.applicationInfo,
cpi.name, cpi.flags);
if (singleton && UserHandle.getUserId(app.uid) != UserHandle.USER_SYSTEM) {
// This is a singleton provider, but a user besides the
// default user is asking to initialize a process it runs
// in... well, no, it doesn't actually run in this process,
// it runs in the process of the default user. Get rid of it.
providers.remove(i);
N--;
i--;
continue;
}
ComponentName comp = new ComponentName(cpi.packageName, cpi.name);
ContentProviderRecord cpr = mProviderMap.getProviderByClass(comp, userId);
if (cpr == null) {
cpr = new ContentProviderRecord(this, cpi, app.info, comp, singleton);
mProviderMap.putProviderByClass(comp, cpr);
}
if (DEBUG_MU) Slog.v(TAG_MU,
"generateApplicationProvidersLocked, cpi.uid = " + cpr.uid);
app.pubProviders.put(cpi.name, cpr);
if (!cpi.multiprocess || !"android".equals(cpi.packageName)) {
// Don't add this if it is a platform component that is marked
// to run in multiple processes, because this is actually
// part of the framework so doesn't make sense to track as a
// separate apk in the process.
app.addPackage(cpi.applicationInfo.packageName, cpi.applicationInfo.versionCode,
mProcessStats);
}
notifyPackageUse(cpi.applicationInfo.packageName,
PackageManager.NOTIFY_PACKAGE_USE_CONTENT_PROVIDER);
}
}
return providers;
}
所以才有后面ams取出ContentProviderRecord的info对象给activityThread的逻辑了，随后ams调用bindApplication进行绑定
从这里可以看到
try {
// If the app is being launched for full backup or restore, bring it up in
// a restricted environment with the base application class.
Application app = data.info.makeApplication(data.restrictedBackupMode, null);
mInitialApplication = app;
// don't bring up providers in restricted mode; they may depend on the
// app's custom Application class
if (!data.restrictedBackupMode) {
if (!ArrayUtils.isEmpty(data.providers)) {
installContentProviders(app, data.providers);
// For process that contains content providers, we want to
// ensure that the JIT is enabled "at some point".
mH.sendEmptyMessageDelayed(H.ENABLE_JIT, 10*1000);
}
}
里面调用了installContentProviders也就是上文有进程后的分析的逻辑
总结：
调用ContentResolver cr = getContentResolver();分为好几个流程：
1:如果activityThread的map有缓存，直接返回
2.如果没有缓存，进行binder通讯，在ams里又分为2个逻辑
2.1:有进程的情况:通过反射创建ContentProvider对象
2.2 没有进程：开启进程，然后同过process把ContentProviderRecord缓存起来，同时创建对象
3设置activityThread的map缓存
