Critical Reading Guide

1. Remind the meaning of critical thinking

2. Distinguishing facts and opinions

3. Examine the accuracy of facts

4. Examine whether facts are relevant to opinions

5. Identify logical flaws and fallacies

6. Identify the validity of implicit premises

7. Come up with primitive well-reasoned conclusions about articles

8. Ask how to further improve an argument and what facts can diminish this argument

9. Detecting author's biases

10. Keep an open mind and challenge preconceived conclusion

11. Try to explain why I accept or reject a conclusion

12. Come up with final conclusions, but keep in mind that all conclusions are challengeable

Explanation:

First, as new critical readers, we need to remind ourselves the definition of critical thinking as a major guideline of the following steps. The definition of critical thinking in Dictionary.com is that "thinking that is clear, rational, open-minded, and informed by evidence". For those people who can use critical thinking as their second nature, they don't need this step anymore.

The real critical reading starts from the second step. Lots of information flows into our mind when we are reading. Distinguishing facts and opinions is the first step to keep us away from confusion. Facts are objective information that can be verified. For example,  "it's 30℃ outside" is a fact because this information is based on verifiable data. However, some people may think 30℃ is comfortable and some may think it is too hot since they have different opinions. Feeling is subjective and it is unverifiable in this situation. Opinions change according to a person's judgments.

When we are able to distinguish facts and opinions, we need to look closer to each of them. Classify an information as a fact does not mean we acknowledge the information is true and accurate. As commoners, we may not have many methods to verified the accuracy of facts. The most efficient way for us to verify information is to check where the information original come from. Some integrity sources, such as Wall Street Journal, Economist, Bloomberg and New York Times, are usually more accurate because reputation is an invaluable asset for them.

Steps 5 and 6 are very similar. After we examine the reliability of facts we should try to link the facts and opinions. Some authors may use solid facts to mislead readers to some opinions. For example, "the temperature is very low, so the weather is bad" is a misleading argument. Readers may think temperature and weather are relevant in some way at the first glance but they are technically two different measurements. This is a logical flaw or fallacy.

Almost every argument has some implicit premises. For example, “I have been to White House, so I have been toWashington D.C” is true under an implicit premise, White House is in WashingtonD.C. If White House is not in Washington D.C, the argument above must be wrong. Implicit premises make our conversion more efficient but an experienced author can set some untrue implicit premises to mislead reader to an opinion he liked. Ignore the implicit premises is very risky in reading and it usually lead us to the wrong conclusion. I personally think this is the hardest part of critical reading.

After readers complete all the process above, they can gradually draw a primitive well-reasoned conclusion. However, this is not the end yet.

To further improve the argument or conclusion, readers can ask themselves what additional information will strengthen or diminish the argument or conclusion. All the scientific conclusion can be proved wrong if some scenarios happen. This principle can be used in any well-reasoned conclusion.

Human beings are not absolute rational, so authors may present facts in favor of his opinions and intentionally or unintentionally ignore the facts against his opinions. Nobody would surprise if FOX News and Washington Post have different opinions in Obamacare. Detecting author's biases is an unavoidable process to justify the opinion and a background check is always a useful tool.

Now, we are approaching to the end. As a critical reader, we should always keep an open mind to welcome new information and remind ourselves that although we already have a pretty solid conclusion but everything is challengeable.

Again! Keep self-directed, self-disciplined, self-monitored, and self-corrective.

最后编辑于
©著作权归作者所有,转载或内容合作请联系作者
  • 序言:七十年代末,一起剥皮案震惊了整个滨河市,随后出现的几起案子,更是在滨河造成了极大的恐慌,老刑警刘岩,带你破解...
    沈念sama阅读 159,458评论 4 363
  • 序言:滨河连续发生了三起死亡事件,死亡现场离奇诡异,居然都是意外死亡,警方通过查阅死者的电脑和手机,发现死者居然都...
    沈念sama阅读 67,454评论 1 294
  • 文/潘晓璐 我一进店门,熙熙楼的掌柜王于贵愁眉苦脸地迎上来,“玉大人,你说我怎么就摊上这事。” “怎么了?”我有些...
    开封第一讲书人阅读 109,171评论 0 243
  • 文/不坏的土叔 我叫张陵,是天一观的道长。 经常有香客问我,道长,这世上最难降的妖魔是什么? 我笑而不...
    开封第一讲书人阅读 44,062评论 0 207
  • 正文 为了忘掉前任,我火速办了婚礼,结果婚礼上,老公的妹妹穿的比我还像新娘。我一直安慰自己,他们只是感情好,可当我...
    茶点故事阅读 52,440评论 3 287
  • 文/花漫 我一把揭开白布。 她就那样静静地躺着,像睡着了一般。 火红的嫁衣衬着肌肤如雪。 梳的纹丝不乱的头发上,一...
    开封第一讲书人阅读 40,661评论 1 219
  • 那天,我揣着相机与录音,去河边找鬼。 笑死,一个胖子当着我的面吹牛,可吹牛的内容都是我干的。 我是一名探鬼主播,决...
    沈念sama阅读 31,906评论 2 313
  • 文/苍兰香墨 我猛地睁开眼,长吁一口气:“原来是场噩梦啊……” “哼!你这毒妇竟也来了?” 一声冷哼从身侧响起,我...
    开封第一讲书人阅读 30,609评论 0 200
  • 序言:老挝万荣一对情侣失踪,失踪者是张志新(化名)和其女友刘颖,没想到半个月后,有当地人在树林里发现了一具尸体,经...
    沈念sama阅读 34,379评论 1 246
  • 正文 独居荒郊野岭守林人离奇死亡,尸身上长有42处带血的脓包…… 初始之章·张勋 以下内容为张勋视角 年9月15日...
    茶点故事阅读 30,600评论 2 246
  • 正文 我和宋清朗相恋三年,在试婚纱的时候发现自己被绿了。 大学时的朋友给我发了我未婚夫和他白月光在一起吃饭的照片。...
    茶点故事阅读 32,085评论 1 261
  • 序言:一个原本活蹦乱跳的男人离奇死亡,死状恐怖,灵堂内的尸体忽然破棺而出,到底是诈尸还是另有隐情,我是刑警宁泽,带...
    沈念sama阅读 28,409评论 2 254
  • 正文 年R本政府宣布,位于F岛的核电站,受9级特大地震影响,放射性物质发生泄漏。R本人自食恶果不足惜,却给世界环境...
    茶点故事阅读 33,072评论 3 237
  • 文/蒙蒙 一、第九天 我趴在偏房一处隐蔽的房顶上张望。 院中可真热闹,春花似锦、人声如沸。这庄子的主人今日做“春日...
    开封第一讲书人阅读 26,088评论 0 8
  • 文/苍兰香墨 我抬头看了看天上的太阳。三九已至,却和暖如春,着一层夹袄步出监牢的瞬间,已是汗流浃背。 一阵脚步声响...
    开封第一讲书人阅读 26,860评论 0 195
  • 我被黑心中介骗来泰国打工, 没想到刚下飞机就差点儿被人妖公主榨干…… 1. 我叫王不留,地道东北人。 一个月前我还...
    沈念sama阅读 35,704评论 2 276
  • 正文 我出身青楼,却偏偏与公主长得像,于是被迫代替她去往敌国和亲。 传闻我的和亲对象是个残疾皇子,可洞房花烛夜当晚...
    茶点故事阅读 35,608评论 2 270

推荐阅读更多精彩内容