设计分析
介绍
提供了对资源占用、释放，线程的等待、唤醒等接口和具体实现，可以用在各种需要控制资源争用的场景中。
| 独占资源接口 | 共享资源接口 |
|---|---|
| acquire | acquireShared |
| release | releaseShared |
| tryAcquire | tryAcquireShared |
| tryRelease | tryReleaseShared |
- acquire、acquireShared：定义了资源争用的逻辑，如果没拿到，则等待。
- tryAcquire、tryAcquireShared：实际执行占用资源的操作，如何判定一个由使用者具体去实现。
- release、releaseShared：定义了释放资源的逻辑，释放之后，通知后续节点进行争抢。
- tryRelease、tryReleaseShared：实际执行资源释放的操作，具体的AQS使用者去实现。
资源占用流程.png
共享式获取与独占式获取区别
共享式与独占式访问资源的对比
共享式获取与独占式获取最主要的区别在于同一时刻能否有多个线程同时获取到同步状态。以文件的读写为例，如果一个程序在对文件进行读操作，那么这一时刻对于该文件的写操作均被阻塞，而读操作能够同时进行。写操作要求对资源的独占式访问，而读操作可以是共享式访问，两种不同的访问模式在同一时刻对文件或资源的访问情况，左半部分，共享式访问资源时，其他共享式的访问均被允许，而独占式访问被阻塞，右半部分是独占式访问资源时，同一时刻其他访问均被阻塞。
同步队列
同步器依赖内部的同步队列（一个FIFO双向队列）来完成同步状态的管理，当前线程获取同步状态失败时，同步器会将当前线程以及等待状态等信息构造成为一个节点（Node）并将其加入同步队列，同时会阻塞当前线程，当同步状态释放时，会把首节点中的线程唤醒，使其再次尝试获取同步状态。
同步队列的基本结构
同步队列的基本结构
节点是构成同步队列的基础，同步器拥有首节点（head）和尾节点（tail），没有成功获取同步状态的线程将会成为节点加入该队列的尾部。
节点加入到同步队列
节点加入到同步队列
同步器包含了两个节点类型的引用，一个指向头节点，而另一个指向尾节点。试想一下，当一个线程成功地获取了同步状态（或者锁），其他线程将无法获取到同步状态，转而被构造成为节点并加入到同步队列中，而这个加入队列的过程必须要保证线程安全，因此同步器提供了一个基于CAS的设置尾节点的方法：compareAndSetTail(Node expect, Node update)，它需要传递当前线程“认为”的尾节点和当前节点，只有设置成功后，当前节点才正式与之前的尾节点建立关联。
设置首节点
设置首节点
设置首节点是通过获取同步状态成功的线程来完成的，由于只有一个线程能够成功获取到同步状态，因此设置头节点的方法并不需要使用CAS来保证，它只需要将首节点设置成为原首节点的后继节点并断开原首节点的next引用即可。
独占式同步状态获取与释放
独占式同步状态获取流程
前驱节点为头节点且能够获取同步状态的判断条件和线程进入等待状态是获取同步状态的自旋过程。当同步状态获取成功之后，当前线程从acquire(int arg)方法返回，如果对于锁这种并发组件而言，代表着当前线程获取了锁。
acquire(独占式获取同步状态)
public final void acquire(int arg) {
if (!tryAcquire(arg) &&
acquireQueued(addWaiter(Node.EXCLUSIVE), arg))
selfInterrupt();
}
上述代码主要完成了同步状态获取、节点构造、加入同步队列以及在同步队列中自旋等待的相关工作，其主要逻辑是：首先调用自定义同步器实现的tryAcquire(int arg)方法，该方法保证线程安全的获取同步状态，如果同步状态获取失败，则构造同步节点（独占式Node. EXCLUSIVE，同一时刻只能有一个线程成功获取同步状态）并通过addWaiter(Node node)方法将该节点加入到同步队列的尾部，最后调用acquireQueued(Node node, int arg)方法，使得该节点以“死循环”的方式获取同步状态。如果获取不到则阻塞节点中的线程，而被阻塞线程的唤醒主要依靠前驱节点的出队或阻塞线程被中断来实现。
private Node addWaiter(Node mode) {
Node node = new Node(Thread.currentThread(), mode);
// Try the fast path of enq; backup to full enq on failure
Node pred = tail;
if (pred != null) {
node.prev = pred;
if (compareAndSetTail(pred, node)) {
pred.next = node;
return node;
}
}
enq(node);
return node;
}
private Node enq(final Node node) {
for (;;) {
Node t = tail;
if (t == null) { // Must initialize
if (compareAndSetHead(new Node()))
tail = head;
} else {
node.prev = t;
if (compareAndSetTail(t, node)) {
t.next = node;
return t;
}
}
}
}
上述代码通过使用compareAndSetTail(Node expect, Node update)方法来确保节点能够被线程安全添加。试想一下：如果使用一个普通的LinkedList来维护节点之间的关系，那么当一个线程获取了同步状态，而其他多个线程由于调用tryAcquire(int arg)方法获取同步状态失败而并发地被添加到LinkedList时，LinkedList将难以保证Node的正确添加，最终的结果可能是节点的数量有偏差，而且顺序也是混乱的。
在enq(final Node node)方法中，同步器通过“死循环”来保证节点的正确添加，在“死循环”中只有通过CAS将节点设置成为尾节点之后，当前线程才能从该方法返回，否则，当前线程不断地尝试设置。可以看出，enq(final Node node)方法将并发添加节点的请求通过CAS变得“串行化”了。
节点进入同步队列之后，就进入了一个自旋的过程，每个节点（或者说每个线程）都在自省地观察，当条件满足，获取到了同步状态，就可以从这个自旋过程中退出，否则依旧留在这个自旋过程中（并会阻塞节点的线程）
final boolean acquireQueued(final Node node, int arg) {
boolean failed = true;
try {
boolean interrupted = false;
for (;;) {
final Node p = node.predecessor();
if (p == head && tryAcquire(arg)) {
setHead(node);
p.next = null; // help GC
failed = false;
return interrupted;
}
if (shouldParkAfterFailedAcquire(p, node) &&
parkAndCheckInterrupt())
interrupted = true;
}
} finally {
if (failed)
cancelAcquire(node);
}
}
在acquireQueued (final Node node, int arg)方法中，当前线程在“死循环”中尝试获取同步状态，而只有前驱节点是头节点才能够尝试获取同步状态，这是为什么？原因有两个，如下。
第一，头节点是成功获取到同步状态的节点，而头节点的线程释放了同步状态之后，将会唤醒其后继节点，后继节点的线程被唤醒后需要检查自己的前驱节点是否是头节点。
第二，维护同步队列的FIFO原则。
节点自旋获取同步状态
由于非首节点线程前驱节点出队或者被中断而从等待状态返回，随后检查自己的前驱是否是头节点，如果是则尝试获取同步状态。可以看到节点和节点之间在循环检查的过程中基本不相互通信，而是简单地判断自己的前驱是否为头节点，这样就使得节点的释放规则符合FIFO，并且也便于对过早通知的处理（过早通知是指前驱节点不是头节点的线程由于中断而被唤醒）。
release(独占式释放同步状态)
该方法在释放了同步状态之后，会唤醒其后继节点（进而使后继节点重新尝试获取同步状态）。
public final boolean release(int arg) {
if (tryRelease(arg)) {
Node h = head;
if (h != null && h.waitStatus != 0)
unparkSuccessor(h);
return true;
}
return false;
}
该方法执行时，会唤醒头节点的后继节点线程，unparkSuccessor(Node node)方法使用LockSupport（在后面的章节会专门介绍）来唤醒处于等待状态的线程。
分析了独占式同步状态获取和释放过程后，适当做个总结：在获取同步状态时，同步器维护一个同步队列，获取状态失败的线程都会被加入到队列中并在队列中进行自旋；移出队列（或停止自旋）的条件是前驱节点为头节点且成功获取了同步状态。在释放同步状态时，同步器调用tryRelease(int arg)方法释放同步状态，然后唤醒头节点的后继节点。
共享式同步状态获取与释放
acquireShared(共享式获取同步状态)
public final void acquireShared(int arg) {
if (tryAcquireShared(arg) < 0)
doAcquireShared(arg);
}
private void doAcquireShared(int arg) {
final Node node = addWaiter(Node.SHARED);
boolean failed = true;
try {
boolean interrupted = false;
for (;;) {
final Node p = node.predecessor();
if (p == head) {
int r = tryAcquireShared(arg);
if (r >= 0) {
setHeadAndPropagate(node, r);
p.next = null; // help GC
if (interrupted)
selfInterrupt();
failed = false;
return;
}
}
if (shouldParkAfterFailedAcquire(p, node) &&
parkAndCheckInterrupt())
interrupted = true;
}
} finally {
if (failed)
cancelAcquire(node);
}
}
在acquireShared(int arg)方法中，同步器调用tryAcquireShared(int arg)方法尝试获取同步状态，tryAcquireShared(int arg)方法返回值为int类型，当返回值大于等于0时，表示能够获取到同步状态。因此，在共享式获取的自旋过程中，成功获取到同步状态并退出自旋的条件就是tryAcquireShared(int arg)方法返回值大于等于0。可以看到，在doAcquireShared(int arg)方法的自旋过程中，如果当前节点的前驱为头节点时，尝试获取同步状态，如果返回值大于等于0，表示该次获取同步状态成功并从自旋过程中退出。
releaseShared(共享式获取同步状态)
public final boolean releaseShared(int arg) {
if (tryReleaseShared(arg)) {
doReleaseShared();
return true;
}
return false;
}
该方法在释放同步状态之后，将会唤醒后续处于等待状态的节点。对于能够支持多个线程同时访问的并发组件（比如Semaphore），它和独占式主要区别在于tryReleaseShared(int arg)方法必须确保同步状态（或者资源数）线程安全释放，一般是通过循环和CAS来保证的，因为释放同步状态的操作会同时来自多个线程。
实现
ReentrantReadWriteLock中的实现
abstract static class Sync extends AbstractQueuedSynchronizer {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 6317671515068378041L;
/*
* Read vs write count extraction constants and functions.
* Lock state is logically divided into two unsigned shorts:
* The lower one representing the exclusive (writer) lock hold count,
* and the upper the shared (reader) hold count.
*/
static final int SHARED_SHIFT = 16;
static final int SHARED_UNIT = (1 << SHARED_SHIFT);
static final int MAX_COUNT = (1 << SHARED_SHIFT) - 1;
static final int EXCLUSIVE_MASK = (1 << SHARED_SHIFT) - 1;
/** Returns the number of shared holds represented in count */
static int sharedCount(int c) { return c >>> SHARED_SHIFT; }
/** Returns the number of exclusive holds represented in count */
static int exclusiveCount(int c) { return c & EXCLUSIVE_MASK; }
/**
* A counter for per-thread read hold counts.
* Maintained as a ThreadLocal; cached in cachedHoldCounter
*/
static final class HoldCounter {
int count = 0;
// Use id, not reference, to avoid garbage retention
final long tid = getThreadId(Thread.currentThread());
}
/**
* ThreadLocal subclass. Easiest to explicitly define for sake
* of deserialization mechanics.
*/
static final class ThreadLocalHoldCounter
extends ThreadLocal<HoldCounter> {
public HoldCounter initialValue() {
return new HoldCounter();
}
}
/**
* The number of reentrant read locks held by current thread.
* Initialized only in constructor and readObject.
* Removed whenever a thread's read hold count drops to 0.
*/
private transient ThreadLocalHoldCounter readHolds;
/**
* The hold count of the last thread to successfully acquire
* readLock. This saves ThreadLocal lookup in the common case
* where the next thread to release is the last one to
* acquire. This is non-volatile since it is just used
* as a heuristic, and would be great for threads to cache.
*
* <p>Can outlive the Thread for which it is caching the read
* hold count, but avoids garbage retention by not retaining a
* reference to the Thread.
*
* <p>Accessed via a benign data race; relies on the memory
* model's final field and out-of-thin-air guarantees.
*/
private transient HoldCounter cachedHoldCounter;
/**
* firstReader is the first thread to have acquired the read lock.
* firstReaderHoldCount is firstReader's hold count.
*
* <p>More precisely, firstReader is the unique thread that last
* changed the shared count from 0 to 1, and has not released the
* read lock since then; null if there is no such thread.
*
* <p>Cannot cause garbage retention unless the thread terminated
* without relinquishing its read locks, since tryReleaseShared
* sets it to null.
*
* <p>Accessed via a benign data race; relies on the memory
* model's out-of-thin-air guarantees for references.
*
* <p>This allows tracking of read holds for uncontended read
* locks to be very cheap.
*/
private transient Thread firstReader = null;
private transient int firstReaderHoldCount;
Sync() {
readHolds = new ThreadLocalHoldCounter();
setState(getState()); // ensures visibility of readHolds
}
/*
* Acquires and releases use the same code for fair and
* nonfair locks, but differ in whether/how they allow barging
* when queues are non-empty.
*/
/**
* Returns true if the current thread, when trying to acquire
* the read lock, and otherwise eligible to do so, should block
* because of policy for overtaking other waiting threads.
*/
abstract boolean readerShouldBlock();
/**
* Returns true if the current thread, when trying to acquire
* the write lock, and otherwise eligible to do so, should block
* because of policy for overtaking other waiting threads.
*/
abstract boolean writerShouldBlock();
/*
* Note that tryRelease and tryAcquire can be called by
* Conditions. So it is possible that their arguments contain
* both read and write holds that are all released during a
* condition wait and re-established in tryAcquire.
*/
protected final boolean tryRelease(int releases) {
if (!isHeldExclusively())
throw new IllegalMonitorStateException();
int nextc = getState() - releases;
boolean free = exclusiveCount(nextc) == 0;
if (free)
setExclusiveOwnerThread(null);
setState(nextc);
return free;
}
protected final boolean tryAcquire(int acquires) {
/*
* Walkthrough:
* 1. If read count nonzero or write count nonzero
* and owner is a different thread, fail.
* 2. If count would saturate, fail. (This can only
* happen if count is already nonzero.)
* 3. Otherwise, this thread is eligible for lock if
* it is either a reentrant acquire or
* queue policy allows it. If so, update state
* and set owner.
*/
Thread current = Thread.currentThread();
int c = getState();
int w = exclusiveCount(c);
if (c != 0) {
// (Note: if c != 0 and w == 0 then shared count != 0)
if (w == 0 || current != getExclusiveOwnerThread())
return false;
if (w + exclusiveCount(acquires) > MAX_COUNT)
throw new Error("Maximum lock count exceeded");
// Reentrant acquire
setState(c + acquires);
return true;
}
if (writerShouldBlock() ||
!compareAndSetState(c, c + acquires))
return false;
setExclusiveOwnerThread(current);
return true;
}
protected final boolean tryReleaseShared(int unused) {
Thread current = Thread.currentThread();
if (firstReader == current) {
// assert firstReaderHoldCount > 0;
if (firstReaderHoldCount == 1)
firstReader = null;
else
firstReaderHoldCount--;
} else {
HoldCounter rh = cachedHoldCounter;
if (rh == null || rh.tid != getThreadId(current))
rh = readHolds.get();
int count = rh.count;
if (count <= 1) {
readHolds.remove();
if (count <= 0)
throw unmatchedUnlockException();
}
--rh.count;
}
for (;;) {
int c = getState();
int nextc = c - SHARED_UNIT;
if (compareAndSetState(c, nextc))
// Releasing the read lock has no effect on readers,
// but it may allow waiting writers to proceed if
// both read and write locks are now free.
return nextc == 0;
}
}
private IllegalMonitorStateException unmatchedUnlockException() {
return new IllegalMonitorStateException(
"attempt to unlock read lock, not locked by current thread");
}
protected final int tryAcquireShared(int unused) {
/*
* Walkthrough:
* 1. If write lock held by another thread, fail.
* 2. Otherwise, this thread is eligible for
* lock wrt state, so ask if it should block
* because of queue policy. If not, try
* to grant by CASing state and updating count.
* Note that step does not check for reentrant
* acquires, which is postponed to full version
* to avoid having to check hold count in
* the more typical non-reentrant case.
* 3. If step 2 fails either because thread
* apparently not eligible or CAS fails or count
* saturated, chain to version with full retry loop.
*/
Thread current = Thread.currentThread();
int c = getState();
if (exclusiveCount(c) != 0 &&
getExclusiveOwnerThread() != current)
return -1;
int r = sharedCount(c);
if (!readerShouldBlock() &&
r < MAX_COUNT &&
compareAndSetState(c, c + SHARED_UNIT)) {
if (r == 0) {
firstReader = current;
firstReaderHoldCount = 1;
} else if (firstReader == current) {
firstReaderHoldCount++;
} else {
HoldCounter rh = cachedHoldCounter;
if (rh == null || rh.tid != getThreadId(current))
cachedHoldCounter = rh = readHolds.get();
else if (rh.count == 0)
readHolds.set(rh);
rh.count++;
}
return 1;
}
return fullTryAcquireShared(current);
}
/**
* Full version of acquire for reads, that handles CAS misses
* and reentrant reads not dealt with in tryAcquireShared.
*/
final int fullTryAcquireShared(Thread current) {
/*
* This code is in part redundant with that in
* tryAcquireShared but is simpler overall by not
* complicating tryAcquireShared with interactions between
* retries and lazily reading hold counts.
*/
HoldCounter rh = null;
for (;;) {
int c = getState();
if (exclusiveCount(c) != 0) {
if (getExclusiveOwnerThread() != current)
return -1;
// else we hold the exclusive lock; blocking here
// would cause deadlock.
} else if (readerShouldBlock()) {
// Make sure we're not acquiring read lock reentrantly
if (firstReader == current) {
// assert firstReaderHoldCount > 0;
} else {
if (rh == null) {
rh = cachedHoldCounter;
if (rh == null || rh.tid != getThreadId(current)) {
rh = readHolds.get();
if (rh.count == 0)
readHolds.remove();
}
}
if (rh.count == 0)
return -1;
}
}
if (sharedCount(c) == MAX_COUNT)
throw new Error("Maximum lock count exceeded");
if (compareAndSetState(c, c + SHARED_UNIT)) {
if (sharedCount(c) == 0) {
firstReader = current;
firstReaderHoldCount = 1;
} else if (firstReader == current) {
firstReaderHoldCount++;
} else {
if (rh == null)
rh = cachedHoldCounter;
if (rh == null || rh.tid != getThreadId(current))
rh = readHolds.get();
else if (rh.count == 0)
readHolds.set(rh);
rh.count++;
cachedHoldCounter = rh; // cache for release
}
return 1;
}
}
}
/**
* Performs tryLock for write, enabling barging in both modes.
* This is identical in effect to tryAcquire except for lack
* of calls to writerShouldBlock.
*/
final boolean tryWriteLock() {
Thread current = Thread.currentThread();
int c = getState();
if (c != 0) {
int w = exclusiveCount(c);
if (w == 0 || current != getExclusiveOwnerThread())
return false;
if (w == MAX_COUNT)
throw new Error("Maximum lock count exceeded");
}
if (!compareAndSetState(c, c + 1))
return false;
setExclusiveOwnerThread(current);
return true;
}
/**
* Performs tryLock for read, enabling barging in both modes.
* This is identical in effect to tryAcquireShared except for
* lack of calls to readerShouldBlock.
*/
final boolean tryReadLock() {
Thread current = Thread.currentThread();
for (;;) {
int c = getState();
if (exclusiveCount(c) != 0 &&
getExclusiveOwnerThread() != current)
return false;
int r = sharedCount(c);
if (r == MAX_COUNT)
throw new Error("Maximum lock count exceeded");
if (compareAndSetState(c, c + SHARED_UNIT)) {
if (r == 0) {
firstReader = current;
firstReaderHoldCount = 1;
} else if (firstReader == current) {
firstReaderHoldCount++;
} else {
HoldCounter rh = cachedHoldCounter;
if (rh == null || rh.tid != getThreadId(current))
cachedHoldCounter = rh = readHolds.get();
else if (rh.count == 0)
readHolds.set(rh);
rh.count++;
}
return true;
}
}
}
protected final boolean isHeldExclusively() {
// While we must in general read state before owner,
// we don't need to do so to check if current thread is owner
return getExclusiveOwnerThread() == Thread.currentThread();
}
// Methods relayed to outer class
final ConditionObject newCondition() {
return new ConditionObject();
}
final Thread getOwner() {
// Must read state before owner to ensure memory consistency
return ((exclusiveCount(getState()) == 0) ?
null :
getExclusiveOwnerThread());
}
final int getReadLockCount() {
return sharedCount(getState());
}
final boolean isWriteLocked() {
return exclusiveCount(getState()) != 0;
}
final int getWriteHoldCount() {
return isHeldExclusively() ? exclusiveCount(getState()) : 0;
}
final int getReadHoldCount() {
if (getReadLockCount() == 0)
return 0;
Thread current = Thread.currentThread();
if (firstReader == current)
return firstReaderHoldCount;
HoldCounter rh = cachedHoldCounter;
if (rh != null && rh.tid == getThreadId(current))
return rh.count;
int count = readHolds.get().count;
if (count == 0) readHolds.remove();
return count;
}
/**
* Reconstitutes the instance from a stream (that is, deserializes it).
*/
private void readObject(java.io.ObjectInputStream s)
throws java.io.IOException, ClassNotFoundException {
s.defaultReadObject();
readHolds = new ThreadLocalHoldCounter();
setState(0); // reset to unlocked state
}
final int getCount() { return getState(); }
}
ReentrantLock中的实现
abstract static class Sync extends AbstractQueuedSynchronizer {
private static final long serialVersionUID = -5179523762034025860L;
/**
* Performs {@link Lock#lock}. The main reason for subclassing
* is to allow fast path for nonfair version.
*/
abstract void lock();
/**
* Performs non-fair tryLock. tryAcquire is implemented in
* subclasses, but both need nonfair try for trylock method.
*/
final boolean nonfairTryAcquire(int acquires) {
final Thread current = Thread.currentThread();
int c = getState();
if (c == 0) {
if (compareAndSetState(0, acquires)) {
setExclusiveOwnerThread(current);
return true;
}
}
else if (current == getExclusiveOwnerThread()) {
int nextc = c + acquires;
if (nextc < 0) // overflow
throw new Error("Maximum lock count exceeded");
setState(nextc);
return true;
}
return false;
}
protected final boolean tryRelease(int releases) {
int c = getState() - releases;
if (Thread.currentThread() != getExclusiveOwnerThread())
throw new IllegalMonitorStateException();
boolean free = false;
if (c == 0) {
free = true;
setExclusiveOwnerThread(null);
}
setState(c);
return free;
}
protected final boolean isHeldExclusively() {
// While we must in general read state before owner,
// we don't need to do so to check if current thread is owner
return getExclusiveOwnerThread() == Thread.currentThread();
}
final ConditionObject newCondition() {
return new ConditionObject();
}
// Methods relayed from outer class
final Thread getOwner() {
return getState() == 0 ? null : getExclusiveOwnerThread();
}
final int getHoldCount() {
return isHeldExclusively() ? getState() : 0;
}
final boolean isLocked() {
return getState() != 0;
}
/**
* Reconstitutes the instance from a stream (that is, deserializes it).
*/
private void readObject(java.io.ObjectInputStream s)
throws java.io.IOException, ClassNotFoundException {
s.defaultReadObject();
setState(0); // reset to unlocked state
}
}
CountDownLatch中的实现
private static final class Sync extends AbstractQueuedSynchronizer {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 4982264981922014374L;
Sync(int count) {
setState(count);
}
int getCount() {
return getState();
}
protected int tryAcquireShared(int acquires) {
return (getState() == 0) ? 1 : -1;
}
protected boolean tryReleaseShared(int releases) {
// Decrement count; signal when transition to zero
for (;;) {
int c = getState();
if (c == 0)
return false;
int nextc = c-1;
if (compareAndSetState(c, nextc))
return nextc == 0;
}
}
}
Semaphore中的实现
abstract static class Sync extends AbstractQueuedSynchronizer {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1192457210091910933L;
Sync(int permits) {
setState(permits);
}
final int getPermits() {
return getState();
}
final int nonfairTryAcquireShared(int acquires) {
for (;;) {
int available = getState();
int remaining = available - acquires;
if (remaining < 0 ||
compareAndSetState(available, remaining))
return remaining;
}
}
protected final boolean tryReleaseShared(int releases) {
for (;;) {
int current = getState();
int next = current + releases;
if (next < current) // overflow
throw new Error("Maximum permit count exceeded");
if (compareAndSetState(current, next))
return true;
}
}
final void reducePermits(int reductions) {
for (;;) {
int current = getState();
int next = current - reductions;
if (next > current) // underflow
throw new Error("Permit count underflow");
if (compareAndSetState(current, next))
return;
}
}
final int drainPermits() {
for (;;) {
int current = getState();
if (current == 0 || compareAndSetState(current, 0))
return current;
}
}
}
图示
字段图
AbstractQueuedSynchronizer_fields.png
exclusiveOwnerThread：当前拥有独占访问权限的线程
方法图
AbstractQueuedSynchronizer_method.png
-
管理同步状态
-
getState()
获取当前同步状态
-
setState(int newState)
设置当前同步状态
-
compareAndSetState(int expect, int update)
使用CAS设置当前状态，该方法能够保证设置的原子性。
-
全图
AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.png
