Capter 4 - Training Models Exercise

1 .Which linear regression training algorithm can you use if you have a training set with millions of features?

Stochastic Gradient Descent or Mini-batch Gradient Descent

2. Suppose the features in your training set have very different scales. Which algorithms might suffer from this, and how? What can you do about it ?

If the features in your training set have very differnt scales, the cost function will have the shape of an elongated bowl, so the Gradient Descent algorithms will take a long time to converge. To solve this you should scale the data before training the model. Note that the Normal Equation or SVD approach will work just fine without scaling. Moreover, regularized modes may converge to suboptimal solution if the features are not scaled: since regularization penalized large weights, features with smaller value will tend to be ignored compared to features with large values.

3. Can gradient descent get stuck in a local minimum when training a logistic regression model?

Gradient Descent cannot get stuck in a local minimum when training a Logistic Regression model because the cost functioin convex.

4. Do all gradient descent algorithms lead to the same model, provided you let them run long enough?

If the optimization problem is convex(Such as Linear Regression or Logistic Regression), and assuming the learning rate is not too high, then all gradient Descent algorithms will approach the global optimum and end up producing fairly similar modes. However, unless you gradually reduce the learning rate, Stochastic GD and Mini-batch GD will nerver truly converge; instead, they will keep jumping back and forth around the global optimum. This means that even if you let them run for a very long time, these Gradient Descent algorithms will produce slightly differnt models.

5. Suppose you use batch gradient descent and you plot the validation error at every epoch. If you notice that the validation error consistently goes up, what is likely going on? How can you fix this?

If the validation error consistentlygose up after every epoch, the one possibility is that the learning rate is too hight and the algorithm is diverging. If the training error also goes up, then this clearly the problem and you should reduce the learning rate. However, if training error is not going up, then your model is overfitting the training set and you should stop training.

6. Is it a good idea to stop mini-batch gradient descent immediately when the validation error goes up?

Due to their random nature, neither Stochastic Gradient Descent nor Mini-batch Gradient Descent is guaranteed to make progress at every single training iteration. So if you immediately stop training when the validation error goes up, you may stop much too eraly, before the optimum is reached. A better option is to save the model at regular intervals; then, when it hs not improved for a long time(meaning it will problably never beet the record), you can revert to the best saved model.

7. Which gradient descent algorithm (among those we discussed) will reach the vicinity of the optimal solution the fastest? Which will actually converge? ow can you make the others converge as well?

Stochastic Gradient Descent has the fastest training iteration since it consider only one training instance at one time, so it generally the first to reach the vicinity of golbal optimum(or Mini-batch GD with a very small mini-batch size). However, only Batch Gradient Descent will actually converge, given enough training time.
As mention, Stochastic GD and Mini-batch GD will nounce around the optimum, unless you gradually reduce the learning rate.

8. Suppose you are using polynomial regression. You plot the learning curves and you notice that there is a large gap between the training error and the validation error. What is happening? What are three ways to solve this?

If the validation erro is much higher than the training error, this is likely because your model is overfitting the training set. One way to try to fix this is reduce the polynomial degree: a model with fewer degrees of freedom is less likely to overfit. Another thing you can try is to regularize the model-for example, by adding an l2 penaly(Ridge) or an l1 penalty(Lasso) to the cost function. This will also reduce the degrees of freedom of the model. Lastly, yopu can try to increase the size of the traniing set.

9. Suppose you are using ridge regression and you notice that the training error and the validation error are almost equal and fairly high. Would you say that the model suffers from high bias or high variance? Should you increase the regularization hyperparameter α or reduce it?

If both the training error and the validation error are almost equal and fairly high, the model is likely underfitting the tranining set, which mean it has a high bias. You should try reducing the regularization hyperarameter a.

10. Why would you want to use:
  1. Ridge regression instead of plain linear regression (i.e., without any regularization)?
    A model with some regularization typically performs better than without any regularization, so you should generally prefer Ridge Regression over plain Linear Regression.
  2. Lasso instead of ridge regression?
    Lasso Regression uses an L1 penalty, which tends to push the weights down to exactly zero. This leads to spares models, where all wights are zero except for the most import weights, this a way to perform feature selection automatically, which is good if you suspect the only a few features actually matter. When you are not sure, you should prefer Ridge Regression.
  3. Elastic net instead of lasso regression?
    Elastic Net is generally preferred over Lasso since Lasso may behave erratically in some cases(when several features are strongly correalated or when there are more features that training instances). However, it does add an extra hyperparameter to tune. if you want Lasso without the erratic behavior , you can just use Elasticv Net with an 11_ratio close to 1.
11. Suppose you want to classify pictures as outdoor/indoor and daytime/nighttime. Should you implement two logistic regression classifiers or one softmax regression classifier?

If you want to classify pictures as outdoor/indoor and daytime/nighttime , since these are not exclusive classes(i.e. all for combinations are possible) you should train two Logistic Regression classifiers.

©著作权归作者所有,转载或内容合作请联系作者
  • 序言:七十年代末,一起剥皮案震惊了整个滨河市,随后出现的几起案子,更是在滨河造成了极大的恐慌,老刑警刘岩,带你破解...
    沈念sama阅读 159,117评论 4 362
  • 序言:滨河连续发生了三起死亡事件,死亡现场离奇诡异,居然都是意外死亡,警方通过查阅死者的电脑和手机,发现死者居然都...
    沈念sama阅读 67,328评论 1 293
  • 文/潘晓璐 我一进店门,熙熙楼的掌柜王于贵愁眉苦脸地迎上来,“玉大人,你说我怎么就摊上这事。” “怎么了?”我有些...
    开封第一讲书人阅读 108,839评论 0 243
  • 文/不坏的土叔 我叫张陵,是天一观的道长。 经常有香客问我,道长,这世上最难降的妖魔是什么? 我笑而不...
    开封第一讲书人阅读 44,007评论 0 206
  • 正文 为了忘掉前任,我火速办了婚礼,结果婚礼上,老公的妹妹穿的比我还像新娘。我一直安慰自己,他们只是感情好,可当我...
    茶点故事阅读 52,384评论 3 287
  • 文/花漫 我一把揭开白布。 她就那样静静地躺着,像睡着了一般。 火红的嫁衣衬着肌肤如雪。 梳的纹丝不乱的头发上,一...
    开封第一讲书人阅读 40,629评论 1 219
  • 那天,我揣着相机与录音,去河边找鬼。 笑死,一个胖子当着我的面吹牛,可吹牛的内容都是我干的。 我是一名探鬼主播,决...
    沈念sama阅读 31,880评论 2 313
  • 文/苍兰香墨 我猛地睁开眼,长吁一口气:“原来是场噩梦啊……” “哼!你这毒妇竟也来了?” 一声冷哼从身侧响起,我...
    开封第一讲书人阅读 30,593评论 0 198
  • 序言:老挝万荣一对情侣失踪,失踪者是张志新(化名)和其女友刘颖,没想到半个月后,有当地人在树林里发现了一具尸体,经...
    沈念sama阅读 34,313评论 1 243
  • 正文 独居荒郊野岭守林人离奇死亡,尸身上长有42处带血的脓包…… 初始之章·张勋 以下内容为张勋视角 年9月15日...
    茶点故事阅读 30,575评论 2 246
  • 正文 我和宋清朗相恋三年,在试婚纱的时候发现自己被绿了。 大学时的朋友给我发了我未婚夫和他白月光在一起吃饭的照片。...
    茶点故事阅读 32,066评论 1 260
  • 序言:一个原本活蹦乱跳的男人离奇死亡,死状恐怖,灵堂内的尸体忽然破棺而出,到底是诈尸还是另有隐情,我是刑警宁泽,带...
    沈念sama阅读 28,392评论 2 253
  • 正文 年R本政府宣布,位于F岛的核电站,受9级特大地震影响,放射性物质发生泄漏。R本人自食恶果不足惜,却给世界环境...
    茶点故事阅读 33,052评论 3 236
  • 文/蒙蒙 一、第九天 我趴在偏房一处隐蔽的房顶上张望。 院中可真热闹,春花似锦、人声如沸。这庄子的主人今日做“春日...
    开封第一讲书人阅读 26,082评论 0 8
  • 文/苍兰香墨 我抬头看了看天上的太阳。三九已至,却和暖如春,着一层夹袄步出监牢的瞬间,已是汗流浃背。 一阵脚步声响...
    开封第一讲书人阅读 26,844评论 0 195
  • 我被黑心中介骗来泰国打工, 没想到刚下飞机就差点儿被人妖公主榨干…… 1. 我叫王不留,地道东北人。 一个月前我还...
    沈念sama阅读 35,662评论 2 274
  • 正文 我出身青楼,却偏偏与公主长得像,于是被迫代替她去往敌国和亲。 传闻我的和亲对象是个残疾皇子,可洞房花烛夜当晚...
    茶点故事阅读 35,575评论 2 270

推荐阅读更多精彩内容